+1moto al wrote: yes your dam right,i wish some people would lighten up.take care moto al
(and its DAMN by the way)
teehee!
+1moto al wrote: yes your dam right,i wish some people would lighten up.take care moto al
cheers i do have dyslexia,ko .site safe aldavsato wrote:+1moto al wrote: yes your dam right,i wish some people would lighten up.take care moto al
(and its DAMN by the way)
teehee!![]()
![]()
Good call, why don't you open this up as a new thread so we can see how many other folk see value in speculating on over exaggerated regulation and rumor?backofbeyond wrote:OK, now we know where you stand. Let's chuck this open to debate - are we fueling future restrictions with this sort of discussion or should it not be mentioned for fear of giving the politicians ideas?East Coast wrote:backofbeyond wrote:Well I have to say that the last post has surprised me. When I brought the topic up it was a simple request to try and bring under one heading the changes in French motoring law and how they affect anyone visiting that country. If you visit France either on two wheels or four you're subject the law of that land and there, as here, ignorance of those laws is no excuse. How that can be a contentious issue and "detrimental to biking" is beyond me.Are you suggesting that I don't know that I am subject to french law while traveling in France?backofbeyond wrote:If you visit France either on two wheels or four you're subject the law of that land and there, as here, ignorance of those laws is no excuse.
Simply put, you are scaremongering and that is the contentious issue! NOT the degree of ignorance towards a mixture of factual and fictitious laws as you are suggesting it is!backofbeyond wrote:How that can be a contentious issue and "detrimental to biking" is beyond me.
Your original post was based on nothing more than hearsay and rumor and the debate that ensued only served to fuel that rumor even further across the internet!backofbeyond wrote: and "detrimental to biking" is beyond me.
Why is this detrimental to biking? Supposing I decided out of thin air to say that it was illegal to carry a pillion passenger in Italy or riders had to carry a spare chain in Germany or maybe even that speed limiters were to going to become law across Europe, it could quite quickly become a viral epidemic of the digital sort, just like most of the stuff that has been banded around and exaggerated about French regs.
Now imagine that a law maker in government picks up on these rumors as a good idea, and at around the same time so does his European counterparts, then all of a sudden what started as fictitious rumor is introduced as a new law and where does that get everyone? I don't want to have a speed limiter fitted to my bike!
If you are going to post stuff like this in future, please get your facts straight first as it really isn't helpful otherwise!
East Coast wrote: In the meantime, if it's the law I will follow it, if it's not I will follow my own common sense thank you!
backofbeyond wrote:East Coast wrote: In the meantime, if it's the law I will follow it, if it's not I will follow my own common sense thank you!
Well, can't fault you with that. Now, perhaps you could tell me exactly what French law requires me to take with me - either on me or on the bike, when I visit that country. After all, in order to follow the law you have to know what it is. That's all this thread, and Al's before it, is trying to determine. Nothing else, no hidden agendas, no political motives, just a list of what I need to stay legal in France. Can you contribute to that?
No probs, email is easy, it's just my user name @hotmail.com but if it's of use for this topic would it not be worth putting it up for all to see?East Coast wrote:
If you would like me to send you a copy of the spreadsheet backofbeyond, PM me your email address and I will email it to you.