It's not just you. Where I live they leap at the chance to put up barriers and a lot of what look like very tempting trails have chains and padlocks or drop down barriers across them.Crossrutted wrote:Ralph, no idea where you go , however where I walk, cycle and ride, farmers already use locked gates to limit access to their fields, tracks etc, do you really think they won't jump at the chance to keep you "orf my land"?-Ralph- wrote:Can't see it myself, too much money to install gates and fences unless there's a problem with people not respecting the land. So yes, maybe if your farm borders an edge of town council estate full of tossers with crossers, then gates will go up, and they are probably up already because tossers with crosser don't care about rights of way laws.Crossrutted wrote:Ralph, the flaw with relying upon riding illegally, is that access will become impossible on most/some lanes as farmers/local authorities will quickly install gates/fences/obstructions.
So the loss of legal trail riding really means the loss of trail riding IMO.
But out where I live, there's no reason to, I don't think I've ever seen any other motorised traffic on the legal lanes we have now. Farmers having to keep a massive bunch of keys in every tractor, jump down and spend 5 minutes finding the right one at every gate? Spending thousands putting up gates because once in a blue moon they see an illegal trail rider? No, won't happen.
Unless of course, it's just me they're targeting !hmy:
One of the local farmers cheerfully admits that he removes signs showing footpaths and bridleways once they're away from the roadside where they can be checked and if he doesn't remove them he lets hedgerows grow over them to obscure them. He's ok though because he says I can use any of the tracks crossing his land or skirt round the edge of the fields when I'm on my mountain bike because I buy him the occasional pint down the pub and we always sponsor his wife when she does her regular charity runs (thumbs)
