Hydrogen as a simple fuel
-
- Posts: 3518
- Joined: Tue May 09, 2017 9:03 pm
- Has thanked: 1414 times
- Been thanked: 1669 times
Re: Hydrogen as a simple fuel
thanks both for your replies.
As a Greenergy customer (100 per cent wind power) I look forward to a reduction in my electricity bill ... but sadly somehow I don't think that's going to happen.
What I meant about hydrogen not being a proper fuel, is that it takes far more energy to produce than it contains...it's therefore only a means of storing/transporting energy, and a challenging one at that. It's a bit like using charcoal when you could use real coal.
Using biomethane as a fuel (as they are now doing in Iceland) seems like a better idea, especially as it stops it being vented to the atmosphere. Quite a few truck fleets in the UK are now using factory-built biomethane trucks. The Scottish whiskey insdstry is now committed to using its biowastes to produce methane to power its trucks. Scania and Iveco gas trucks use spark ignition and have a low compression ratio, while the Volvo version retains the diesel CR and uses a small injection of diesel to 'spark' combustion just before the gas is injected. I look at all the slurry tanks that the dairy farms have around here, and wonder why no-one's built a digester yet.
As a Greenergy customer (100 per cent wind power) I look forward to a reduction in my electricity bill ... but sadly somehow I don't think that's going to happen.
What I meant about hydrogen not being a proper fuel, is that it takes far more energy to produce than it contains...it's therefore only a means of storing/transporting energy, and a challenging one at that. It's a bit like using charcoal when you could use real coal.
Using biomethane as a fuel (as they are now doing in Iceland) seems like a better idea, especially as it stops it being vented to the atmosphere. Quite a few truck fleets in the UK are now using factory-built biomethane trucks. The Scottish whiskey insdstry is now committed to using its biowastes to produce methane to power its trucks. Scania and Iveco gas trucks use spark ignition and have a low compression ratio, while the Volvo version retains the diesel CR and uses a small injection of diesel to 'spark' combustion just before the gas is injected. I look at all the slurry tanks that the dairy farms have around here, and wonder why no-one's built a digester yet.
-
- Posts: 4790
- Joined: Fri Dec 28, 2012 10:47 pm
- Location: Limousin France
- Has thanked: 2452 times
- Been thanked: 3293 times
Re: Hydrogen as a simple fuel
Richard, there are hundreds of anaerobic digestion units in use around the UK. I commissioned AD units myself when I was policy manager for Surrey County Council, about 18 years ago, and it wasn't new then. Nice simple technology, scaleable and not too expensive. You get a nice soil improver too as an additional product - especially good from separate domestic kitchen waste collections, now provided by over half of the UK's waste collection authorities. Some schemes power the collection fleet using the methane.Richard Simpson Mark II wrote: ↑Sun Aug 01, 2021 10:42 am thanks both for your replies.
As a Greenergy customer (100 per cent wind power) I look forward to a reduction in my electricity bill ... but sadly somehow I don't think that's going to happen.
What I meant about hydrogen not being a proper fuel, is that it takes far more energy to produce than it contains...it's therefore only a means of storing/transporting energy, and a challenging one at that. It's a bit like using charcoal when you could use real coal.
Using biomethane as a fuel (as they are now doing in Iceland) seems like a better idea, especially as it stops it being vented to the atmosphere. Quite a few truck fleets in the UK are now using factory-built biomethane trucks. The Scottish whiskey insdstry is now committed to using its biowastes to produce methane to power its trucks. Scania and Iveco gas trucks use spark ignition and have a low compression ratio, while the Volvo version retains the diesel CR and uses a small injection of diesel to 'spark' combustion just before the gas is injected. I look at all the slurry tanks that the dairy farms have around here, and wonder why no-one's built a digester yet.
-
- Posts: 2116
- Joined: Sat Nov 09, 2013 5:36 pm
- Has thanked: 95 times
- Been thanked: 448 times
Re: Hydrogen as a simple fuel
I think the upshot of all the previous comments actually shows that there are plenty of alternatives to both fossil fuels and the Musk effect---its just that politicians are both ill informed, ignorant, career minded and swayed by big business so its an uphill battle to get funds deployed to "sensible" alternatives to fossil fuels--and by the way I used to lecture Energy Conversion Engineering at MSc level so have done a lot of research over the years. We need to think about Stirling engines again(developed to go under the bonnet back in the 70s when we had the last real fuel crisis. ) They are closed cycle and just need a hot source---burning anything will do that will maintain a steady 700C .
-
- Posts: 4790
- Joined: Fri Dec 28, 2012 10:47 pm
- Location: Limousin France
- Has thanked: 2452 times
- Been thanked: 3293 times
-
- Posts: 3518
- Joined: Tue May 09, 2017 9:03 pm
- Has thanked: 1414 times
- Been thanked: 1669 times
Re: Hydrogen as a simple fuel
Hi Dave,daveuprite wrote: ↑Sun Aug 01, 2021 10:56 amRichard, there are hundreds of anaerobic digestion units in use around the UK. I commissioned AD units myself when I was policy manager for Surrey County Council, about 18 years ago, and it wasn't new then. Nice simple technology, scaleable and not too expensive. You get a nice soil improver too as an additional product - especially good from separate domestic kitchen waste collections, now provided by over half of the UK's waste collection authorities. Some schemes power the collection fleet using the methane.Richard Simpson Mark II wrote: ↑Sun Aug 01, 2021 10:42 am thanks both for your replies.
As a Greenergy customer (100 per cent wind power) I look forward to a reduction in my electricity bill ... but sadly somehow I don't think that's going to happen.
What I meant about hydrogen not being a proper fuel, is that it takes far more energy to produce than it contains...it's therefore only a means of storing/transporting energy, and a challenging one at that. It's a bit like using charcoal when you could use real coal.
Using biomethane as a fuel (as they are now doing in Iceland) seems like a better idea, especially as it stops it being vented to the atmosphere. Quite a few truck fleets in the UK are now using factory-built biomethane trucks. The Scottish whiskey insdstry is now committed to using its biowastes to produce methane to power its trucks. Scania and Iveco gas trucks use spark ignition and have a low compression ratio, while the Volvo version retains the diesel CR and uses a small injection of diesel to 'spark' combustion just before the gas is injected. I look at all the slurry tanks that the dairy farms have around here, and wonder why no-one's built a digester yet.
Yes indeed. My question was more that in an area with loads of dairy farms (the massive Davidstow creamery is very close) I'm just amazed that no one is collecting and dealing with the cow slurry by sticking it in a digester. It's just spread in its raw state on the fields at the moment, which isn't ideal.
You'd have thought that, if the Government is serious enough about this issue to legislate us all out of internal combustion engined vehicles, ban our gas boilers etc etc, then they could quite simply facilitate the construction of a network of methane digesters.
-
- Posts: 4790
- Joined: Fri Dec 28, 2012 10:47 pm
- Location: Limousin France
- Has thanked: 2452 times
- Been thanked: 3293 times
Re: Hydrogen as a simple fuel
Yeah well it's too late for a lot of the methane - that's already been burped or farted out by the time you get to collecting slurry! And it's a major cause of anthropogenic GHGs.Richard Simpson Mark II wrote: ↑Mon Aug 02, 2021 4:28 pmHi Dave,daveuprite wrote: ↑Sun Aug 01, 2021 10:56 amRichard, there are hundreds of anaerobic digestion units in use around the UK. I commissioned AD units myself when I was policy manager for Surrey County Council, about 18 years ago, and it wasn't new then. Nice simple technology, scaleable and not too expensive. You get a nice soil improver too as an additional product - especially good from separate domestic kitchen waste collections, now provided by over half of the UK's waste collection authorities. Some schemes power the collection fleet using the methane.Richard Simpson Mark II wrote: ↑Sun Aug 01, 2021 10:42 am thanks both for your replies.
As a Greenergy customer (100 per cent wind power) I look forward to a reduction in my electricity bill ... but sadly somehow I don't think that's going to happen.
What I meant about hydrogen not being a proper fuel, is that it takes far more energy to produce than it contains...it's therefore only a means of storing/transporting energy, and a challenging one at that. It's a bit like using charcoal when you could use real coal.
Using biomethane as a fuel (as they are now doing in Iceland) seems like a better idea, especially as it stops it being vented to the atmosphere. Quite a few truck fleets in the UK are now using factory-built biomethane trucks. The Scottish whiskey insdstry is now committed to using its biowastes to produce methane to power its trucks. Scania and Iveco gas trucks use spark ignition and have a low compression ratio, while the Volvo version retains the diesel CR and uses a small injection of diesel to 'spark' combustion just before the gas is injected. I look at all the slurry tanks that the dairy farms have around here, and wonder why no-one's built a digester yet.
Yes indeed. My question was more that in an area with loads of dairy farms (the massive Davidstow creamery is very close) I'm just amazed that no one is collecting and dealing with the cow slurry by sticking it in a digester. It's just spread in its raw state on the fields at the moment, which isn't ideal.
You'd have thought that, if the Government is serious enough about this issue to legislate us all out of internal combustion engined vehicles, ban our gas boilers etc etc, then they could quite simply facilitate the construction of a network of methane digesters.
-
- Posts: 4790
- Joined: Fri Dec 28, 2012 10:47 pm
- Location: Limousin France
- Has thanked: 2452 times
- Been thanked: 3293 times
Re: Hydrogen as a simple fuel
What? Nothing at all to do with being 'clever'. Because it's a universally accepted scientific phrase that has been used for ages, often abbreviated to AGW. If you regularly read the literature around climate change you'd be very familiar with it and accept it as the standard language used all over the place.
Besides, why use four words when you can use one?
Last edited by daveuprite on Mon Aug 02, 2021 7:25 pm, edited 1 time in total.
-
- Posts: 240
- Joined: Sun Apr 25, 2021 5:09 pm
- Location: Earth
- Has thanked: 287 times
- Been thanked: 132 times
Re: Hydrogen as a simple fuel
It's actually not a word. It's an acronym. It's generally accepted rule of good writing that when you use an acronym in an article, you also explain what it means. Never assume your readers know it. When the article is very short, or you only use the acronym once, you should avoid using the acronym altogether. End Of Rant (EOR).daveuprite wrote: ↑Mon Aug 02, 2021 6:05 pmWhat? Nothing at all to do with being 'clever'. Because it's a universally accepted scientific phrase that has been used for ages, often abbreviated to AGW. If you regularly read the literature around climate change you'd be very familiar with it and accept it as the standard language used all over the place.
Besides, why use four words when you can use one?
Champagne taste on beer budget.