Big and Powerful or Smaller and Nimble?
Big and Powerful or Smaller and Nimble?
I've been riding for a long time but I haven't been off road on a bike in several years and big powerful bikes with electronic traction aids were not around then. Of the people that have had multiple size bikes, have you found it to be better on a smaller, less powerful bike or a bigger one with lots of power but electronics to maintain traction to get you through tougher spots?
-
- Posts: 3519
- Joined: Tue May 09, 2017 9:03 pm
- Has thanked: 1414 times
- Been thanked: 1669 times
Re: Big and Powerful or Smaller and Nimble?
Smaller and lighter the better. And a good set of tyres. Falling off/over is inevitable, and a quarter-tonne bike is quite heavy to lift out of a ditch.
Power isn't the normal limitation, grip is. And TC can't create grip, it can only maximise the grip you have.
Power isn't the normal limitation, grip is. And TC can't create grip, it can only maximise the grip you have.
-
- Posts: 4790
- Joined: Fri Dec 28, 2012 10:47 pm
- Location: Limousin France
- Has thanked: 2452 times
- Been thanked: 3293 times
Re: Big and Powerful or Smaller and Nimble?
That's a good question.
Consider the case of Beta 4T enduro bikes. They now all weigh the same and share the same frame. You can choose between a 350, 390, 430 and 480cc engine but everything else remains basically the same.
The idea is that every engine brings different characteristics. The 350 is the buzzy high-revving nimble bike. The 390 is the long-stroke all-rounder. The 430 is the competitive enduro bike. The 480 is the big lugger.
BUT, the 480 also has a map switch that changes it from full power to rain mode. So wouldn't you just buy the big 480 and when you get into the nadgery slippery stuff just use the button to tone it down? In which case why bother buying any of the lower CC variants? Or is it never possible to get rid of the crude big thumper torque?
I still ride an old school carb-fed 450 Beta so I don't know the answer. But I'd like to trade up some time and not sure what map switching can achieve on an off-road bike.
Consider the case of Beta 4T enduro bikes. They now all weigh the same and share the same frame. You can choose between a 350, 390, 430 and 480cc engine but everything else remains basically the same.
The idea is that every engine brings different characteristics. The 350 is the buzzy high-revving nimble bike. The 390 is the long-stroke all-rounder. The 430 is the competitive enduro bike. The 480 is the big lugger.
BUT, the 480 also has a map switch that changes it from full power to rain mode. So wouldn't you just buy the big 480 and when you get into the nadgery slippery stuff just use the button to tone it down? In which case why bother buying any of the lower CC variants? Or is it never possible to get rid of the crude big thumper torque?
I still ride an old school carb-fed 450 Beta so I don't know the answer. But I'd like to trade up some time and not sure what map switching can achieve on an off-road bike.
-
- Posts: 1277
- Joined: Mon Jan 28, 2013 11:46 pm
- Location: Llanelli
- Has thanked: 1187 times
- Been thanked: 761 times
Re: Big and Powerful or Smaller and Nimble?
for most moving things lighter is more effective. We do not always ride motorbikes in the leisure enviroment for effectiveness we sometimes do so for challenge, but most people will tell you that small bikes make better off tarmac bikes, they are certainly easier. I have ridden a bit of each but easy trails may not give the satisfaction ridden on a small bike when they might on a bigger bike, makes the answer a little more difficult for me. Enjoy your ride which ever you way you go, rideing the trails just adds so much more to it.
-
- Posts: 3042
- Joined: Tue Sep 06, 2011 2:05 pm
- Has thanked: 1404 times
- Been thanked: 652 times
Re: Big and Powerful or Smaller and Nimble?
'offroad' is actually a very large spectrum so you really need to define what your intended use is. Then you can decide wether to ride or van the bike, what terrain you will encounter and finally what tyres you will need.
Open your eyes and you see what is in front of you, open your mind and you see a bigger picture but open your heart and you see a whole new World.
- Asgard
- Posts: 825
- Joined: Thu Jun 07, 2018 7:45 pm
- Location: Variable
- Has thanked: 173 times
- Been thanked: 381 times
Re: Big and Powerful or Smaller and Nimble?
I would agree that light and nimble is most definitely the best choice off road unless your very talented.
If you have a trailer or van no problem, get that sweet little thing and enjoy.........But
...............If you need to ride a long distance to the trail then the choice gets complicated the small bike with low end gearing might not suit if it takes you twice as long to get to the trail and leaves you with only half the time to enjoy the dirt, its all swings and roundabouts
I have a WR250F I use for the tight Welsh Lanes but if Im riding it anywhere but the very local stuff I stick it on a trailer
Saying that, if you take a look at what Godspeed gets up to with smaller Bikes, it completely blows my theory apart
If you have a trailer or van no problem, get that sweet little thing and enjoy.........But
...............If you need to ride a long distance to the trail then the choice gets complicated the small bike with low end gearing might not suit if it takes you twice as long to get to the trail and leaves you with only half the time to enjoy the dirt, its all swings and roundabouts
I have a WR250F I use for the tight Welsh Lanes but if Im riding it anywhere but the very local stuff I stick it on a trailer
Saying that, if you take a look at what Godspeed gets up to with smaller Bikes, it completely blows my theory apart
Its a trick............get an Axe
-
- Posts: 229
- Joined: Wed Oct 09, 2019 6:00 pm
- Location: Builth Wells
- Has thanked: 130 times
- Been thanked: 106 times
Re: Big and Powerful or Smaller and Nimble?
Haha!
They're all differently fabulous
Big GS is super exhilarating when its dry and there is grip - they are a magic carpet - but you mustnt lose concentration.
Little Alp is really relaxing to ride and punches way above its weight - but tedious going anywhere on tarmac.
701 is in between, smoother than a full-on enduro, buttery clutch and great low-speed - and a hooligan on the back-lanes when you're on tarmac when you want it to be.
They're all differently fabulous
Big GS is super exhilarating when its dry and there is grip - they are a magic carpet - but you mustnt lose concentration.
Little Alp is really relaxing to ride and punches way above its weight - but tedious going anywhere on tarmac.
701 is in between, smoother than a full-on enduro, buttery clutch and great low-speed - and a hooligan on the back-lanes when you're on tarmac when you want it to be.
2021 890 Adventure R
1982 R80 G/S with Siebenrock
2020 500 Excf Rally Bike
2020 500 Excf Trail Bike
1957 Velocette 500 Scrambler
1982 R80 G/S with Siebenrock
2020 500 Excf Rally Bike
2020 500 Excf Trail Bike
1957 Velocette 500 Scrambler
-
- Posts: 317
- Joined: Mon Jul 08, 2019 10:11 pm
- Has thanked: 100 times
- Been thanked: 117 times
Re: Big and Powerful or Smaller and Nimble?
I’ve been riding bikes for a very long time - no car - and I’m happy to ride my 250kg adventure bike on dry trails in Europe but for British green lanes I use a WR250R.
I’ve ridden with some excellent riders (like bikenav) who can ride their GSs on lanes I dread on my 250 so it’s all about the rider and not bike electronics.
If you can only afford 1 bike and need a big bike for distance then get some off-road training and go for it.
Otherwise I would recommend getting a small trail bike alongside your big one and enjoy.
I’ve ridden with some excellent riders (like bikenav) who can ride their GSs on lanes I dread on my 250 so it’s all about the rider and not bike electronics.
If you can only afford 1 bike and need a big bike for distance then get some off-road training and go for it.
Otherwise I would recommend getting a small trail bike alongside your big one and enjoy.
-
- Posts: 4443
- Joined: Thu Mar 07, 2013 6:14 pm
- Has thanked: 2280 times
- Been thanked: 992 times
Re: Big and Powerful or Smaller and Nimble?
I agree with RS that tyres make a great difference, whatever bike. Obviously it is nice to have the power of a big bike, but the older ones are not so fast on tarmac anyway (TTR600 shitty panties moments often), while the 701 seems like a great compromise.
what no one has mentioned, the obvious, is that when you ride a smaller bike ... the power to weight ratio brings the effective power higher, so you feel you are riding a more powerful bike than it actually is, as it is dragging less weight.
I've had a KE100 and that pulled great enough for me over the marlborough downs and ridgeways, while the crf230 was also well balanced in terms of power, the crf250L being near the apex of rideability and versatility, but excelling in nothing .. except versatility.
of course, there is the little problem of motorway or main road distance riding .. too small a bike can be a pain ... but if you adapt your mind set, a compromise can be reached suited to the type of places you wish to go.
e.g. an alp4 will do longer distances better, an alp2 is lighter and more nimble .. but when they have a rest .. which one do you want? .. and/but when you travel far .. which one do you want?
i have come to the conclusion that it is best to choose your places before you choose the bike?
what no one has mentioned, the obvious, is that when you ride a smaller bike ... the power to weight ratio brings the effective power higher, so you feel you are riding a more powerful bike than it actually is, as it is dragging less weight.
I've had a KE100 and that pulled great enough for me over the marlborough downs and ridgeways, while the crf230 was also well balanced in terms of power, the crf250L being near the apex of rideability and versatility, but excelling in nothing .. except versatility.
of course, there is the little problem of motorway or main road distance riding .. too small a bike can be a pain ... but if you adapt your mind set, a compromise can be reached suited to the type of places you wish to go.
e.g. an alp4 will do longer distances better, an alp2 is lighter and more nimble .. but when they have a rest .. which one do you want? .. and/but when you travel far .. which one do you want?
i have come to the conclusion that it is best to choose your places before you choose the bike?